According to rajkotupdates.news : rrr filed pil in telangana high court before release, a PIL was filed against the upcoming blockbuster RRR in Telangana high court, which claims that historical facts have been distorted in it. She demanded a stay on its release and that a censor certificate should not be issued.
Two judges of the Telangana high court, Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Abhinand Kumar Shavali dismissed the petition. They remarked that “poison could kill Socrates but not his ideas”.
Alluri Sowmya’s PIL
Before SS Rajamouli’s magnum opus RRR starring Jr NTR and Ram Charan came out, it faced numerous controversies. One of these was a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by Alluri Sowmya, who objected to the film’s portrayal of freedom fighters Alluri Sitaram Raju and Komaram Bheem as police officers. She alleged that the depiction of these two heroes is at odds with their lifestyle and that the film is damaging their reputations and legacy.
The petitioner argued that the story of these heroes had been embellished and falsified, which was a serious violation of their rights. She asked for the court to reject a censor certificate and stop the movie from being released until further notice.
However, a two-judge panel of the Telangana high court dismissed the PIL on Tuesday. Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Abhinand Kumar Shavali dubbed it as “incorrect” and said that nothing can harm the reputations of great personalities like Alluri Sitarama Raju or Komaram Bheem. They also referred to the fact that poison could kill Socrates but not his ideas or literature.
A student from West Godavari district in Andhra Pradesh, Alluri Sowmya, had filed a public interest litigation against SS Rajamouli’s movie. She argued that the film distorts the history of legendary freedom fighters Alluri Sitarama Raju and Komaram Bheem and intentionally hurts their feelings. She demands that both the censor certificates be refused and a stay on its release be imposed.
Alluri Sowmya’s PIL had cited several reasons for her dissatisfaction with the movie’s portrayal of these two legendary freedom fighters. The student argued that the portrayal of Alluri Sitarama Raju as a police officer was contrary to his lifestyle and that the movie was damaging Alluri Sitaram’s image and legacy. She added that the film distorts the story of both heroes and that it should not be released.
In response to the PIL, SS Rajamouli filed an affidavit in which he defended his movie. He emphasized that the Censor Board constituted under the Cinematograph Act, 1952, has all the power to grant a censor certificate and that even if the contentions of Sowmya are accepted, the characters of Alluri Sitarama Raju and Kambaram Bheem are portrayed as highly patriotic.
SS Rajamouli’s response
A PIL was filed against the upcoming SS Rajamouli film RRR in Telangana high court before release. It is alleged that the movie distorts historical facts and tries to hurt the reputation of two great heroes. The PIL was filed by a student from the West Godavari district.
The PIL is seeking a stay order on the film and that the censor board should not issue a censor certificate to it. It also says that the film distorts the history of Alluri Sitarama Raju and Komaram Bheem, who are freedom fighters.
SS Rajamouli directed the film, which is set in the 1920s and stars Ram Charan as Rama Raju and NTR as Komaram Bheem. The film was made on a budget of Rs550 crore and received universal acclaim for its direction, script, performances, soundtrack, background score, cinematography, editing, and VFX. The film has been released in multiple languages including Telugu, Malayalam, Tamil, Kannada, and Hindi.
According to reports, the PIL was filed by Alluri Sowmya from Undrajavaram in the West Godavari district of Andhra Pradesh. She said that the film distorted the history of Alluri Sitarama and Komaram Bheem, and sought to prevent the movie from being released.
On Tuesday, a two-judge bench of Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Abhinand Kumar Shavali dismissed the PIL. The judges observed that nothing can harm the reputation of great personalities, citing that poison could kill Socrates but not his ideas or literature.
Sowmya argued that Alluri Sitarama was shown as a police officer in the film and Bheem’s character was portrayed as a Muslim, which distorted their story. She asked that the censor board not be issued a censor certificate and that both characters’ names be removed from the film’s credits.
SS Rajamouli replied to Sowmya’s PIL by saying that the film does not violate any law. He also stated that he is not going to make a sequel to RRR and that he was still working on the film. He said that he did not want to turn the film into a franchise but he wanted to keep it alive.
Impact of the PIL on RRR’s release
Before SS Rajamouli’s RRR was released, there were a few legal challenges that the film faced. One of these was a PIL that was filed by Alluri Sowmya against the film.
A PIL is a petition that an individual or non-government organization can file in court in order to seek justice on an issue that has a larger public interest. It aims at giving common people an opportunity to seek redress in a court of law and thereby uphold the rule of law.
The concept of a PIL is not new but has come to be a very important aspect of jurisprudence in India. It is a tool that can be used to fight government suppression and bring about social change.
It is also a way of ensuring that the rights of the poor and oppressed are not violated. It is a powerful weapon in the hands of activists and lawyers who can take up cases against governmental misconduct, repression and custodial violence.
This can be done by filing a case in court or by sending letters to the court. The courts can decide on whether to entertain a PIL based on the information provided in the petition or on other evidence.
Although PILs are a great way of bringing about social change, they can be misused by people who have vested interests. The Judiciary needs to be careful in the use of these petitions in order to avoid Judicial Overreach that is in violation of the principle of Separation of Power.
In this regard, a Supreme Court bench recently came down heavily on frivolous public interest litigation petitions. It said that these were causing unnecessary strain on the courts and resulting in inordinate delays in the disposal of genuine cases.
While the impact of a PIL on the release of a film is still unknown, it is important to know that it can be a good way of raising public concerns and ensuring that public interest is protected. However, it is up to the court to decide whether the allegations have merit and if they will impact the film’s release.
SS Rajamouli’s RRR (rajkotupdates.news : rrr filed pil in telangana high court before release), an international blockbuster that has taken the world by storm, is one of the most expensive films ever made. Its global success is a rare and thrilling leap for Indian cinema, breaking the barriers of language and culture.
It’s also an exciting and innovative film. It’s a fusion of Indian and western influences, something that’s not often seen in the world of international cinema.
To a global audience inundated with superhero content and franchises, this movie stands out because it defies convention. It’s a wildly different kind of filmmaking, with a focus on sincerity and emotion rather than the self-awareness and winking irony that dominate American blockbusters.
The movie’s premise is that two freedom fighters, Jr NTR and Ram Charan, bond over their mutual derring-do. They meet in the 1920s, where they agree to a dangerous impromptu rescue mission. The movie shows them battling an army of armed British soldiers, accompanied by a herd of angry tigers and stags.
But it’s not just a spectacular action film: It’s also a story about friendship and family. In the film, Raju (Junior NTR) and Bheem (Ram Charan) form a close bond after they come to Delhi together in the 1920s. They each agree to take on a rescue mission that might save a little girl.
They do this in the name of freedom, a principle that’s at the heart of their shared history. That’s an important point to make, because it’s often easy to forget that these two men are true heroes and that their stories are worthy of celebration.
A public interest litigation was filed by a student named Alluri Sowmya, who claimed that the film distorted historical facts and misrepresented the lives of the freedom fighters, Sitaram Raju and Komaram Bheem. The student had alleged that a censor certificate should not be issued to the film and sought a stay on its release.
The PIL was rejected by the Telangana high court, whose two-judge panel included Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Abhinand Kumar Shavili. “Poison could kill Socrates, but not his ideas or literature,” the court noted.
Ackermans is a South African value retailer that has been in operation since 1916. With ov…